by Anne Collier
NetFamilyNews.org

Two high school students and a 19-year-old “ringleader” advertised themselves as “party girls” available as a threesome in an online classifieds sites, the Pioneer Press reports , citing an FBI investigation. The 19-year-old “was arrested by the FBI last month and charged in US District Court with sex trafficking of minors, a federal offense.” The Pioneer Press adds that the case is just the “latest in the Twin Cities involving sex rings” using free online classifieds to advertise; “but this time, the participants are minors.” These teens fit the profile of online teens most at risk for sexual exploitation (see the profile). The Press adds that investigators are debating whether teen prostitution is on the rise because the Internet, but “the majority of juvenile prostitutes is still thought to be runaways, illegal immigrants and children from poor urban areas. But an August 2003 Newsweek exposé examined the increase of juvenile sex workers in suburbs. The story focused on a Twin Cities girl from an affluent home who relished the fast cash and picked up men at the Mall of America.”

By Anne Collier
NetFamilyNews.org

Four percent of US online youths have been asked to send sexually explicit photos of themselves over the Net, and about 1.5% have done so, the Associated Press reports, citing a new study by the Crimes Against Children Research Center. That’s not just extremely unwise; those photos could be considered illegal child pornography, distribution of which is a federal crime. One of the study’s authors, Kimberly Mitchell, told the AP that kids need to know this. “Mitchell said kids also may not be aware of how quickly such photos can circulate, mistakenly thinking the image is only for the personal use of the requester,” according to the AP. Here are the conditions that she and her co-authors identified as making kids more likely to receive these requests for explicit photos of themselves: “having a close relationship with someone known only online; talking with someone online about sex or having a sexually suggestive screen name; and experiencing physical or sexual abuse offline.” The study, which is being published this week in the Journal of Adolescent Health, is an analysis of data from a 2005 phone survey of 1,500 Net users aged 10-17, the AP reports (its authors said the numbers could be higher now, with greater use of camera phones, Web cams, and other digital-photo devices). The study’s margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.

by Anne Collier
NetFamilyNews.org

Friday, July 20, 2007

It was great to see the Associated Press’s “Net threats result of kids’ online behavior.” It means newspapers and broadcast media worldwide just may run this story, and more parents will be getting facts instead of scary messages based on ignorance, politics, well-intentioned guesswork. Here are some facts we have now:

Fact No. 1: Posting personal info online isn’t actually what makes kids most vulnerable to predators. “Rather, victimization is more likely to result from … talking about sex with people met online and intentionally embarrassing someone else on the Internet,” the AP reports. The first form of aggressive behavior - talking about sex with strangers online - is about predation, the second about harassing or cyberbullying, which affects a great many more teens (about one-third of all online youth, according to the latest Pew/Internet study - see this).

Fact No. 2: “Online victims tend to be teens with troubles offline, such as poor relationships with parents, loneliness and depression” (see “Profile of a teen online victim”). The kids most at risk online are already risk-seekers and -takers in real life.

Fact No. 3: A lot of sexual-victimization cases happen at the hands of peers, not adults, the AP reports, citing the work of the University of New Hampshire’s Crimes Against Children Research Center. It also cites a 2004 study by the CACRC finding that, even when offenders are adults, they “generally aren’t strangers, and pedophiles aren’t luring unsuspecting children by pretending to be a peer.”

Certainly nobody’s saying kids should completely relax about posting personal info about themselves. It’s common sense that the more discreet they are the less info there’ll be to use against them. But the reality is, sharing - thoughts, media, experiences - is what today’s very social, user-driven Web is all about, and a lot of parents can breathe easier knowing that posting personal info online is not as high-risk as once thought.

So what we are saying is that it’s time to look at the facts we now have and adjust our child-protection strategies accordingly at home, in schools, and in policymaking. We need to…

by Larry Magid

A famous cartoon from the New Yorker shows a dog sitting in front of a computer telling another dog, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” But now, thanks to the Internet, everyone knows everything about you. Or at least they might be able to find out.

Online reputations are increasingly important in the workplace, in school, and even in social life. Search engines make it easy to find information about most anyone, especially if that person has been active online. With the rise of social networking sites, more information is available than ever before. Whether it’s someone you want to date, a potential employer, or a college admissions counselor, if there’s information out there about you and they want to find it, chances are that they can.

Information Online Forever

Once something is posted online, it can be accessible forever. What was cool, funny, or innocuous at age 16 or 18 could prove embarrassing or even damaging when you’re 24 or 42. Even if you delete something, anything you post could be “cached” or stored by search engines. The Web site www.archive.org operates the “way back machine” that resurrects old versions of Web sites, even if content has changed or been removed.

If you don’t want to share information with the world, don’t put it on a public Web site. If it’s something that you absolutely don’t want to share, don’t even post it on a private profile or send it via e-mail. (more…)